• News & Analysis
    • All News & Analysis
    • American Values & Politics
    • Sharia Governance & Values
    • US Hate Groups & Crimes
    • Overseas Extremism
    • US Islamist Activity
    • Fact Sheets & Special Reports
    • Subscribe
  • Intelligence Network
  • Films
  • Activism
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Contact Us
Menu
  • News & Analysis
    • All News & Analysis
    • American Values & Politics
    • Sharia Governance & Values
    • US Hate Groups & Crimes
    • Overseas Extremism
    • US Islamist Activity
    • Fact Sheets & Special Reports
    • Subscribe
  • Intelligence Network
  • Films
  • Activism
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Contact Us
Search
Close
Donate
Menu
Home Uncategorized

UK Islamists Deny Past Extremism — But Only in Public

by Meira Svirsky
July 14, 2014
Reading Time: 5min read

Most extremists probably do not, understandably, like to be accused of extremism. They might even find that in the eyes of the public simply denying the allegation is enough to offset all evidence to the contrary.

Denials, even if not necessarily sincere, can be successful, perhaps because so many people have been persuaded to regard religious extremists as victims of prejudice — a view they rightly do not ascribe to political activists, such as members of neo-Nazi organizations.

Sahib Bleher, a spokesperson for the Islamic Party of Britain [IPB], for instance, claims that, "never and nowhere did the Islamic Party of Britain advocate the killing of homosexuals." The IPB's website, however, explicitly statesthat "Islam condemns and outlaws homosexuality. As far as Islamic law is concerned, the rules are that the state does not interfere in the privacy of people's homes, but it would need to safeguard public decency by preventing any public advocacy for homosexuality. Such activity would come under the heading of public incitement. The death penalty … only applies to a public display of lewdness witnessed by several people."

This policy is also archived on Bleher's own website.

Further references to homosexuality found within the IPB's publications include mention of the "organized homosexual movement," in which homosexuals are compared to "thieves, murderers and adulterers" and described as "spiritually sick."

In addition, Bleher claims that the IPB does not wish "to transform Britain into an Islamic state." Again, the IPB's own publications demonstrate otherwise. In a piece published 1997, the IPB discusses how to turn Britain into an Islamic state, and laments "Muslim communities in the West … neglect[ing] the political and the economic dimensions of Islam, reducing Islam to a merely cultural expression."

The Islamic Party of Britain is denying these allegations, despite the evidence still available on their website, possibly because they wish to gain the approval of the general public by portraying themselves as victims of a "witch-hunt."

It even appears that the current leader of the IPB, David Moses Pidcock, has in fact successfully requestedGoogle to remove certain information about him from the results of its European search engine — a request made possible because of a recent data protection ruling by the Court of Justice of the European Union.

The Islamic Party of Britain is certainly not the only extremist group to use such methods. Leaders of the East London Mosque, for instance, recently tried to claim that their refusal to allow Muhammad ibn Adam Al-Kawthari to speak on their premises in February 2014 was an illustration of their uncompromising stand against extremism.

Al-Kawthari is a Deobandi preacher who calls for the stoning of adulterers, claims it is permissible for a husband to rape his wife, and tells Muslims to push Christians and Jews out of the way while walking in the street.

Although the Mosque claimed to have banned Al Kawthari from speaking, a note published on Al-Kawthari's Facebook page tells a different story. Al-Kawthari quotes a communication from the East London Mosque; itstates: "The ELM has not banned Mufti Muhammad Ibn Adam Al-Kawthari. We have no issues with matters, as clearly defined in Islamic jurisprudence raised by the Mufti."

Al Kawthari added: "ELM management have assured me that some miscommunication may have taken place, and that they will do a press release very soon stating that I am not banned from speaking at their venue."

No such press release, however, has ever been sent out.

Moreover, just a few months later, in May 2014, after publicly distancing themselves from Al-Kawthari and privately reassuring him of their support, representatives of the East London Mosque hosted a "six-week evening course" with Imam Fadel Soliman, an extremist Egyptian preacher who has called for the killing of American soldiers in Iraq. Soliman also claims that the punishment for "fornication" is "100 lashes" and supports the amputation of thieves' hands.

There are countless other examples of such goings-on. Imam Abdul Qayyum, for instance, the Chief Imam of the East London Mosque, has been accused of signing the Istanbul Declaration, which advocates attacks on British troops and Jewish communities across the world.

Qayyum is also part of the Joseph Interfaith Foundation, an inter-religious dialogue group the trustees of which recently included the British peer, Lord Ahmed, who, in 2012, while a trustee, was suspended from the Labour Party and has since resigned. He had claimed on Pakistani television that he was only jailed for dangerous driving in 2008 because of pressure on the courts from "Jews" who, he said, "own newspapers and TV channels."

Both Qayyum and the head of the Joseph Interfaith Foundation, Mehri Niknam, claim that Qayyum is not a signatory to the Istanbul Declaration — even though his name clearly appears on the original Arabic document.

This hollow denial, in the face of evidence indicating otherwise, nevertheless appeared good enough for Mehri Niknam to dismiss the accusations as trumped up, and it has evidently been good enough for publicly-funded umbrella bodies such as the Inter Faith Network for the United Kingdom, of which Niknam's Joseph Interfaith Foundation is a leading member body.

Sahib Bleher and his Islamic Party of Britain, like many, seem happy to contradict themselves publicly — possibly in the hope that where there is contradiction, there is uncertainty; and where there is uncertainty, there is room for fundamentalists to claim victimization at the hands of their allegedly "Islamophobic" critics, while at the same time reassuring their Islamist supporters that their dogma has not been cut back.

 

Sam Westrop is a Senior Fellow at the Gatestone Institute and also Director of Stand for Peace, a counter-extremism organization based in London. He appears regularly on television and radio to discuss the problem of Islamist, far-Left and far-Right extremism.

This article appeared originally on GatestoneInstitute.org

Tags: News Analysis
ShareTweetSendSend

Related Posts

Former al-Qaeda propagandist Jesse Morton, center (Photo_ Flickr/New America)
Preventing Violent Extremism

Former Al-Qaeda Recruiter: Can Secularism Be Salvaged?

April 19, 2020
Iranian protester confronts a regime security officer. Why the Democrat silence on support for the anti-regime protesters? (Photo: AFP via Getty Images)
Uncategorized

Democrat Silence on Support for Iranian Protesters

January 14, 2020
Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif listens as Iran's President Hassan Rouhani speaks at the 74th session of the United Nations General Assembly September 25, 2019, in New York. (Photo: DON EMMERT/AFP via Getty Images)
Uncategorized

US Denies Visa to Iranian FM Zarif & Other Fallouts of the Soleimani Hit

January 7, 2020
Members of the Brooklyn Hancock Street Bloods gang (Photo: Wikipedia Commons/Og rahim rashad/CC4.0)
Uncategorized

NY Muslim Patrol Bullies Get Bullied Back by the Bloods

December 17, 2019
Rescue crews at the site of the Jersey City anti-Semitic attack (Photo: BRYAN R. SMITH/AFP via Getty Images)
American Values & Politics

Anti-Semitic Attack Leaves 4 Victims Dead in New Jersey

December 11, 2019
Tens of thousands of Lebanese demonstrators in the center of Beirut in Martyrs' Square October 27, 2019 (Photo: AFP via Getty Images)
Uncategorized

Protests in Lebanon, Iraq Point to End of Iranian Influence

October 28, 2019

Discussion about this post

Most Read

Dark Days for America? Big Tech Wields Cudgel on Conservative Voices

6 days ago

From Street Thugs to the High-Brow Salon Circles, the Right to Free Speech Is Increasingly Under Attack

3 months ago

A Look at What’s Ahead for 2021

2 weeks ago

Pakistan: Top Cleric Says Israel Belongs to Jews

3 weeks ago

Iran Establishing New Facts on the Ground to Leverage Biden Administration

1 week ago

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

By entering your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

contact us

[email protected]
1-888-610-2221

locate us

2020 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Suite 395, Washington, DC 20006

follow us

Youtube
Facebook-f
Twitter

News & Analysis

  • American Values & Politics
  • Sharia Governance & Values
  • US Hate Groups & Crimes
  • US Islamist Activity
  • Overseas Extremism
  • Fact Sheets & Special Reports
  • Subscribe

Intelligence Network

  • About Clarion Intel Network
  • Fuqra Files
  • US Extremists Map

Films

  • Iranium
  • Honor Diaries
  • Faithkeepers
  • Kids
  • Short Films

Activism

  • Preventing Violent Extremism
  • Exposing Foreign Funding
  • Our Speakers

about us

  • Who We Are
  • What We Do
  • Advisory Board
  • Partnerships
  • Donate
  • Contact Us
  • Donor Privacy Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© Clarion Project Inc. 2020 — All Rights Reserved
501(c)(3) EIN #20-5845679
Menu
  • News & Analysis
    • All News & Analysis
    • American Values & Politics
    • Sharia Governance & Values
    • US Hate Groups & Crimes
    • Overseas Extremism
    • US Islamist Activity
    • Fact Sheets & Special Reports
    • Subscribe
  • Intelligence Network
  • Films
  • Activism
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Contact Us
Search
Donate