• News & Analysis
    • All News & Analysis
    • American Values & Politics
    • Sharia Governance & Values
    • US Hate Groups & Crimes
    • Overseas Extremism
    • US Islamist Activity
    • Fact Sheets & Special Reports
    • Subscribe
  • Intelligence Network
  • Films
  • Activism
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Contact Us
Menu
  • News & Analysis
    • All News & Analysis
    • American Values & Politics
    • Sharia Governance & Values
    • US Hate Groups & Crimes
    • Overseas Extremism
    • US Islamist Activity
    • Fact Sheets & Special Reports
    • Subscribe
  • Intelligence Network
  • Films
  • Activism
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Contact Us
Search
Close
Donate
Menu
Home US Islamist Activity US Terrorism

Should Terrorists Be Questioned About Their Faith?

by Meira Svirsky
March 29, 2018
Reading Time: 2min read
A demonstration in London (Photo: Reuters)
A demonstration in London (Photo: Reuters)

The UK’s independent reviewer of terrorism legislation, Max Hill, is at it again – twisting himself into a convoluted pretzel seemingly to be able to come up with the highest level of political correctness.

Hill previously told us that it is “fundamentally wrong” to use the words “Islamist terrorism” to describe, well…Islamist terrorism. Hill believed that the word “terrorism” should not be linked “to any of the world religions” and that instead, the words “Daesh-inspired terrorism” should be used.

At the time, we argued this display of political correctness was yet another attempt by a Western government to put its proverbial head in the sand about the real and ongoing threat we all face – not just from ISIS but from all Islamist terrorists.

We also said not making the distinction leads to more racism and anti-Muslim bigotry, since the average person understands all too well the scourge of Islamist terrorism.

Now Hill says it’s not “appropriate to ask detailed religious questions in every case where a Muslims has been arrested on suspicion of [terrorism].”

Hill made the remark after concluding his inquiry into the police investigation of the Westminster Bridge attack in which five people were killed. (In that investigation, Hill ruled the police acted appropriately.)

Hill’s suggestion, like his previous one, is disconnected from reality. The very definition of terrorism is the use of violence by non-state actors or groups against civilians in the pursuit of a political goal.

Given world events since about the 1970s, religion has been at the forefront of terrorism committed by Muslims. Arguments can be made about whether or not these Muslims have interpreted their religion correctly, but that is an entirely different topic.

Hill also recommended that police be given the option of releasing terrorism suspects on bail before they are officially charged.

All told, recommendations like these only serve to make police investigations harder and the public less safe.

We’d like your opinion on the subject. Please take our poll and write to us your comments:

 

RELATED STORIES

Was the Austin Bomber a Terrorist?

How the UK Dropped the Ball on This Child Terrorist

Why Are Suspected Terrorists Allowed to Buy Guns?

 

Tags: UK
ShareTweetSendSend

Related Posts

Powis Castle, Great Britain: Hercules Slays the Hydra (Photo: Michael Garlick/Wikimedia Commons)
US Homeland Security

Decades after 9/11, America Faces Hydra of Terror

September 10, 2020
(Photo: MaxPixel.net)
US Homeland Security

US Gov’t Sting Operation Confiscates $1 Million in Terrorist Bitcoin Scheme

August 18, 2020
(Photo: Clarion Project)
American Values & Politics

In the Crosshairs

July 2, 2020
‘The FBI Saved Me’– How an ISIS Militant Was Deradicalized
Human Rights Activists

‘The FBI Saved Me’– How an ISIS Militant Was Deradicalized

June 28, 2020
An Antifa demonstrator at a Denver protest. (Photo: JASON CONNOLLY/AFP/Getty Images)
101

Antifa Unpacked: Watch The Mauro Report

June 11, 2020
The US intel community just dropped the ball twice (Clarion Project)
101

Recent al-Qaeda Attacks on Military Bases in US: What’s Our Strategy?

June 10, 2020

Discussion about this post

Most Read

Dark Days for America? Big Tech Wields Cudgel on Conservative Voices

1 week ago

From Street Thugs to the High-Brow Salon Circles, the Right to Free Speech Is Increasingly Under Attack

3 months ago

Should Extremist Content Be Taken Down or Should We Talk About It?

4 weeks ago

Pakistan: Top Cleric Says Israel Belongs to Jews

3 weeks ago

A Look at What’s Ahead for 2021

2 weeks ago

Subscribe To Our Newsletter

By entering your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

contact us

[email protected]
1-888-610-2221

locate us

2020 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Suite 395, Washington, DC 20006

follow us

Youtube
Facebook-f
Twitter

News & Analysis

  • American Values & Politics
  • Sharia Governance & Values
  • US Hate Groups & Crimes
  • US Islamist Activity
  • Overseas Extremism
  • Fact Sheets & Special Reports
  • Subscribe

Intelligence Network

  • About Clarion Intel Network
  • Fuqra Files
  • US Extremists Map

Films

  • Iranium
  • Honor Diaries
  • Faithkeepers
  • Kids
  • Short Films

Activism

  • Preventing Violent Extremism
  • Exposing Foreign Funding
  • Our Speakers

about us

  • Who We Are
  • What We Do
  • Advisory Board
  • Partnerships
  • Donate
  • Contact Us
  • Donor Privacy Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© Clarion Project Inc. 2020 — All Rights Reserved
501(c)(3) EIN #20-5845679
Menu
  • News & Analysis
    • All News & Analysis
    • American Values & Politics
    • Sharia Governance & Values
    • US Hate Groups & Crimes
    • Overseas Extremism
    • US Islamist Activity
    • Fact Sheets & Special Reports
    • Subscribe
  • Intelligence Network
  • Films
  • Activism
  • About
    • Who We Are
    • What We Do
    • Contact Us
Search
Donate