CIA: Iran Abiding by Nuke Deal. Seriously?

Share on facebook
Share on twitter
Share on whatsapp
Share on email
Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammed Zarif laughs as the negotiations over the nuclear deal were coming to a close in 2015 (Photo: Reuters)
Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammed Zarif laughs as the negotiations over the nuclear deal were coming to a close in 2015 (Photo: Reuters)

Last week, CIA Director Gina Haspel, FBI Director Christopher Wray and Director of National Intelligence Daniel Coats testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee saying — in contradiction to President Trump — that Iran is abiding by the nuclear deal it made with the world powers in 2015.

Apparently what this trio – as well as the entire European Union –failed to notice was that just a few days earlier — Iran’s nuclear chief Ali Akbar Salehi disclosed how Iran made a mockery out of the agreement, even to the point of admitting pictures of cement being poured down the Arak plutonium reactor’s core (as required by the agreement) were photoshopped.

Iran did pour concrete down the pipes of the heavy water reactor, but only after procuring new replacement pipes, Salehi revealed in a January 22 interview.

Watch the interview in English by clicking here

Only Salehi and Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei knew there were additional pipes, but did not tell anyone else about it.

Salehi also said Iran took “preliminary steps…to design modern 20 percent [nuclear] fuel and [that it is] on the threshold of producing it.” Salehi affirmed that domestic specialists will be able to keep all kinds of reactors similar to the Tehran Research Reactor running and outlined a number of ways Iran had exploited the agreement.

According to retired Lt. Colonel Michael Segall, a senior analyst at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs, “Iran continues with its nuclear activities unabated. Iranian leaders confess they continued with nuclear development.”

In 1987, U.S. President Ronald Reagan signed the INF (intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces) Treaty with Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev. But Reagan only signed the agreement after the Russians conceded certain human rights to their citizens. In contrast, the Iranian nuclear deal made allowances for Iranian human rights violations, thereby subordinating American human rights concerns to the deal.

As a consequence, instead of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (the official name for the deal) serving as leverage for stability, countries in the Middle East such as Syria became a repository for dead bodies as Iran funneled its new-found money to terrorist organizations, including Hezbollah. And while the European Union and other nations condemned Trump’s decision to withdraw from the deal, their adverse judgment was clearly not out of concern for nuclear proliferation—to say nothing of human rights—but due to the fact they would have risked capital losses.

France’s trade with Iran grew 118 percent from January to October 2017, for example, (as compared to the same timeframe from the previous year). The French oil company Total concluded a $4.8 billion deal to develop the world’s largest gas field in Pars (southwest Iran) over the next 20 years. Germany gained $3.5 billion in exports to Iran in 2017. China’s trade with Iran was more than $37 billion in 2017; it exported $18.59 billion worth of goods, a growth of 13% from the previous year.

In contrast, U.S. sanctions, implemented after its pullout from the JCPOA, triggered mass protests throughout Iran calling for an end to their theocratic form of government. Yet, U.S. lawmakers and the EU seemed to ignore what Trump said when he announced the U.S. withdrawal from the agreement:

“It has now been almost 40 years since this dictatorship seized power and took a proud nation hostage. Most of Iran’s 80 million citizens have sadly never known an Iran that prospered in peace with its neighbors and commanded the admiration of the world. But the future of Iran belongs to its people. They are the rightful heirs to a rich culture and an ancient land. And they deserve a nation that does justice to their dreams, honor to their history, and glory to God.”

Traditionally, the Shiite idea of jihad is intimately linked to its perceptions of historical suffering and grievances, especially in light of the Twelfth (missing) Imam, who Shiites believe will return during the end of times and restore Islamic world order.

The Iranians hold that this Twelfth Imam can only be awakened from his trance by cataclysmic world events, which may be one of the reasons the ayatollahs are so adamant to acquire nuclear weapons.



Puppy Love Out, Nukes In

Iran Ups the Ante as US Troops Pull Out of Syria

Iranian Front Group Funds Institutions Across US 


Subscribe to our newsletter

By entering your email, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.

Mario Alexis Portella

Portella holds an MA in Medieval History from Fordham University in New York and a double doctorate in Canon Law and Civil Law from the Pontifical Lateran University in Rome. Portella is an American priest at the Cathedral of Santa Maria del Fiore in Florence, Italy and Chancellor of its archdiocese. He is the author of Islam: Religion of Peace? - The Violation of Natural Rights and Western-Cover-Up.

Be ahead of the curve and get Clarion Project's news and opinion straight to your inbox